The contradictory public narratives have created uncertainty in global energy markets. Oil futures whipsawed throughout Sunday's trading session, with Brent crude swinging by more than $8 per barrel as traders attempted to parse the diplomatic signals. The volatility underscores the economic consequences of the credibility gap between Washington and Tehran.

Western diplomats, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, suggested that indirect communications may have occurred through third-party intermediaries, potentially explaining how both governments could offer such divergent characterizations of the same interactions. Oman and Switzerland have historically served as backchannel facilitators between the adversaries.

The public dissonance complicates efforts to de-escalate the crisis, now in its 23rd day since Iran began restricting commercial passage through the strait in response to continued strikes on its energy infrastructure. Maritime insurance rates for vessels transiting the region have increased by 300 percent, while several major shipping companies have suspended Persian Gulf routes entirely.

Analysts note that Iran's domestic political calendar may constrain negotiating flexibility. Parliamentary elections are scheduled for June, creating pressure on the government to demonstrate resolve against external pressure. The public rejection of negotiations serves both to rally domestic support and signal to hardline constituencies that the leadership will not capitulate.

The United States has not formally responded to Iran's latest statement. The White House declined to comment Sunday evening, referring questions to the State Department, which did not immediately provide clarification.

For regional observers who have watched U.S.-Iran relations deteriorate over the past eight years, the current impasse offers little cause for optimism. Until both governments can agree on the basic facts of their own communications, substantive progress toward resolving the crisis appears remote.