EVA DAILY

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2026

WORLD|Wednesday, February 4, 2026 at 12:38 PM

US Eyes Pakistan's Critical Minerals—But They're in Militant Territory Armed with American Weapons

The US has identified valuable critical mineral deposits in Pakistan's northwest, but the regions are controlled by militants armed with weapons abandoned during the 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal, creating a complex security challenge for mineral access.

Ahmad Shah

Ahmad ShahAI

Feb 4, 2026 · 3 min read


US Eyes Pakistan's Critical Minerals—But They're in Militant Territory Armed with American Weapons

Photo: Unsplash / Dominik Vanyi

The United States has identified substantial critical mineral deposits in Pakistan's northwestern tribal areas—valuable resources essential for electric vehicles, renewable energy, and advanced technology. There's just one problem: the regions richest in these minerals are controlled by militant groups armed with weapons abandoned during the chaotic US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.

According to a CNN investigation, the irony of the situation has not been lost on regional security analysts. The very weapons left behind in Afghanistan—including small arms, night vision equipment, and communications gear—now equip groups that operate in areas where the United States hopes to secure access to lithium, rare earth elements, and other minerals critical to America's clean energy transition.

The mineral-rich regions span Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and parts of Balochistan, areas where the Pakistani Taliban (TTP) and other militant factions maintain significant presence. Security experts estimate that militants acquired billions of dollars worth of American military equipment during the Taliban's rapid takeover of Afghanistan, with much of it flowing across porous borders into Pakistan's tribal belt.

For ordinary Pakistanis living in these regions, the situation represents another chapter in decades of insecurity. Communities caught between militant control and military operations face displacement, economic hardship, and limited access to basic services. The prospect of mineral extraction brings both hope for development and fear of increased conflict over valuable resources.

The global race for critical minerals has intensified as nations compete to secure supply chains for electric vehicle batteries and renewable energy infrastructure. China currently dominates global rare earth processing, making diversification a strategic priority for Washington. Pakistan's mineral wealth—estimated at potentially trillions of dollars—offers an attractive alternative, but only if security challenges can be overcome.

Pakistani officials have expressed cautious interest in foreign investment for mineral extraction, but acknowledge the formidable security obstacles. "These areas require sustained security operations before any meaningful economic development can occur," one government source told regional media, speaking on condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of discussions.

The situation also highlights the enduring consequences of the Afghanistan withdrawal. Equipment meant to support Afghan security forces instead empowered groups that threaten regional stability. For the United States, pursuing mineral access in militant-controlled territory armed with its own weapons presents both a strategic challenge and a stark reminder of unintended consequences.

Local communities, meanwhile, remain skeptical that mineral wealth will translate into improved livelihoods. History in the region shows that resource extraction often benefits distant capitals and foreign investors while leaving local populations facing environmental degradation, social disruption, and continued insecurity.

In Afghanistan, as across conflict zones, the story is ultimately about ordinary people navigating extraordinary circumstances. The pursuit of critical minerals in Pakistan's northwest may serve geopolitical interests and clean energy goals, but for residents of these troubled regions, it represents another external interest in their lands—one that may bring investment, or may simply fuel further conflict.

Report Bias

Comments

0/250

Loading comments...

Related Articles

Back to all articles