The Trump administration is proposing a new critical minerals trading bloc with U.S. allies, complete with price floors to prevent Chinese market manipulation. It's OPEC for lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements. The irony of a Republican administration advocating for government-set price controls is rich.
Here's the economics: China currently controls 60-90% of global processing for most critical minerals, despite not always being the primary source of raw materials. This gives Beijing enormous leverage over supply chains for electric vehicles, semiconductors, defense systems, and renewable energy infrastructure.
The U.S. proposal, outlined in recent discussions with allies including Australia, Canada, and Japan, would establish minimum prices for key minerals. The goal: prevent China from flooding markets with below-cost materials to undercut Western mining operations.
The business case is straightforward. Western mining projects need 7-10 years and hundreds of millions in investment to reach production. If China can crash prices right as a new mine comes online, the project becomes economically unviable. Rinse and repeat, and you've locked in Chinese dominance for another generation.
Vice President JD Vance has been pushing this strategy, framing it as national security. He's not wrong on the security angle, but let's be clear about what this is: industrial policy. The same Republicans who rail against government intervention are now proposing cartel-style market manipulation.
Will it work? That's the multi-billion-dollar question. OPEC struggles to maintain price discipline among members with shared interests. This minerals bloc would include countries with wildly different economic priorities. Australia wants to sell iron ore to China. Japan depends on Chinese rare earths. Getting everyone to hold the line on price floors will be challenging.
Commodity markets are already reacting. Lithium prices have been volatile, trading around $12,000 per ton after peaking above $80,000 in 2022. Rare earth prices have been similarly unstable. Investors are watching to see if this proposal has teeth or if it's just another talking point.
The Chinese response has been predictable: accusations of protectionism and threats of retaliation. Beijing has already demonstrated willingness to restrict rare earth exports when politically convenient.
For U.S. miners and battery manufacturers, this could be transformative or could be vaporware, depending on execution. Talk is cheap. Building mines and processing facilities takes capital and political will.
The numbers don't lie: the West needs to break Chinese dominance in critical minerals. Whether a price floor cartel is the right mechanism remains to be seen.
