The Financial Conduct Authority has granted Palantir, the controversial American technology firm co-founded by billionaire Peter Thiel, access to sensitive financial intelligence data in a three-month trial aimed at tackling fraud, raising fresh concerns over data sovereignty and privacy protections in post-Brexit Britain.
The deal, first reported by The Guardian, marks another significant expansion of Palantir's reach into British state institutions, following contracts with the NHS and Ministry of Defence. The FCA will allow the company to analyse intelligence data using its artificial intelligence systems, ostensibly to identify patterns of financial fraud and misconduct.
Campaign groups have expressed alarm at the arrangement, noting that Palantir's track record on privacy and its close ties to American intelligence agencies present potential risks to British data sovereignty. "We are handing the keys to our most sensitive financial regulatory data to a foreign corporation with deep connections to the US security state," one privacy advocate told The Guardian.
As they say in Westminster, "the constitution is what happens"—precedent matters more than law. This latest contract establishes a troubling pattern of American technology firms gaining privileged access to British state data, a development that would have faced far greater scrutiny within the European Union's stricter data protection framework.
The timing is particularly significant. Whilst European regulators have taken an increasingly hard line on American technology companies—the EU fined several Silicon Valley giants billions of pounds for data protection violations last year—Britain's post-Brexit regulatory divergence appears to favour closer integration with US firms.
Thiel, a prominent supporter of President Donald Trump, has positioned Palantir as indispensable to Western security and intelligence operations. The company now holds contracts worth hundreds of millions across British government departments, despite persistent concerns about transparency and accountability.


