In a development that would have been unthinkable five years ago, NATO is planning its first major military exercise without American participation, according to alliance officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. The exercise, tentatively scheduled for late 2026, represents a watershed moment in the 75-year-old alliance's history and underscores European efforts to develop autonomous defense capabilities.
According to The New York Times, the exercise will focus on rapid deployment and logistics across European territory, with Germany and Spain serving as primary staging areas. Approximately 20,000 troops from European NATO members are expected to participate.
The decision reflects growing European concern about American reliability as a security guarantor. President Trump's repeated criticism of NATO and suggestions that the United States might not honor Article 5 commitments have accelerated planning for scenarios in which European allies must defend themselves without American support.
"To understand today's headlines, we must look at yesterday's decisions," the old adage goes. NATO's European pillar has long been militarily dependent on American airlift, intelligence, logistics, and combat power. The alliance's largest exercises—from Cold War-era REFORGER to recent Defender Europe drills—have been American-led and American-heavy operations.
This exercise deliberately inverts that model. While the United States has been informed of the planning, American forces will not participate. The absence is designed to test European capabilities in command, control, logistics, and interoperability without relying on Pentagon systems and American enablers.
"This is about building European strategic autonomy within the NATO framework," a senior alliance official told reporters in Brussels. "We hope American commitment remains steadfast, but we must be prepared for all contingencies."
The exercise comes as European defense spending has surged in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine and American unpredictability. Poland now spends 4.8% of GDP on defense—far exceeding NATO's 2% target—while Germany has committed to €100 billion in additional military investment.
However, European capabilities remain far short of American standards. The continent lacks sufficient strategic airlift, satellite reconnaissance, aerial refueling, and precision munitions stockpiles. European armies, structured for expeditionary operations rather than territorial defense, would struggle to repel a determined Russian assault without American reinforcement.
The exercise is expected to reveal these gaps starkly. NATO planners anticipate significant challenges in logistics, particularly moving heavy armor across European rail and road networks. Intelligence fusion—integrating reconnaissance from multiple national systems—will test interoperability frameworks that have atrophied during decades of American dominance.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has publicly emphasized that the exercise is "complementary" to American engagement, not a substitute. However, officials privately acknowledge it sends a clear signal: Europe is preparing for life without guaranteed American protection.
For Washington, the exercise represents both vindication and warning. American officials have long demanded that European allies shoulder greater defense burdens. However, a militarily autonomous Europe could make independent strategic choices—on Russia, China, or the Middle East—that diverge from American interests.
The exercise also raises uncomfortable questions about NATO's future structure. If European members develop genuine autonomous capabilities, does the alliance's integrated command structure make sense? Would SACEUR—Supreme Allied Commander Europe, traditionally an American general—remain acceptable to European governments bearing the primary defense burden?
These questions have no easy answers. What is clear is that the transatlantic security architecture that emerged from World War II and stabilized through the Cold War is undergoing its most profound transformation since 1949. And for the first time, Europeans are contemplating defense without America—not by choice, but by necessity.



