Ekrem İmamoğlu, Istanbul's popular opposition mayor, laid out a carefully calibrated position on Turkey's Kurdish question this week, rejecting both collective rights and ethnic-based legal frameworks while acknowledging the need for equal citizenship.
"We are not saying we will give special rights to our Kurdish citizens. On the contrary, I am fundamentally against this," İmamoğlu told IndyTurk in an interview. "Separating citizens according to their identities and making legal arrangements accordingly will not solve our problems; it will create even bigger problems we can never solve."
The statement reflects İmamoğlu's balancing act as he positions himself as the opposition's strongest presidential contender while navigating Turkey's most politically sensitive issue. His approach attempts to address Kurdish grievances without alienating nationalist voters or triggering government accusations of separatism.
In Turkey, as at the crossroads of continents, identity and strategy require balancing multiple worlds. İmamoğlu's formulation echoes republican principles of equal citizenship while distancing himself from proposals for Kurdish autonomy or language rights that have historically divided Turkish politics.
The timing carries significance. President Erdoğan's government has recently revived contacts with imprisoned PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan, sparking debate about a potential new "solution process" to Turkey's four-decade Kurdish conflict. İmamoğlu's intervention stakes out opposition territory on an issue where the ruling AKP has historically dominated the narrative.
Yet İmamoğlu's positioning has drawn criticism from multiple directions. Pro-Kurdish opposition parties argue his stance ignores systemic discrimination requiring specific remedies. Nationalist commentators question whether acknowledging a "Kurdish question" legitimizes separatist claims.
Archival statements complicate the mayor's current framing. In a 2019 interview with , İmamoğlu stated: His evolution from rejecting the term entirely to addressing the issue while opposing collective rights illustrates the narrow political space available for opposition figures on Kurdish politics.




