Georgia lawmakers are leading a push to ban new AI data centers, citing electricity consumption that would make a cryptocurrency mining farm blush.

The proposed legislation comes as utilities warn that AI infrastructure could strain the state's power grid to breaking point. Georgia Power reports that a single large-scale AI training facility can consume as much electricity as 100,000 homes - and tech companies want to build dozens of them.

"We're being asked to choose between powering homes and powering chatbots," one state representative told reporters. The concern isn't theoretical: Northern Virginia, already the world's largest data center market, is experiencing rolling brownouts as AI facilities multiply.

The technology is impressive - these data centers train models that can diagnose diseases and write code. The question is whether anyone needs them badly enough to sacrifice residential power reliability.

Environmental groups back the ban, pointing to carbon emissions equivalent to adding millions of cars to state roads. Tech industry lobbyists counter that AI infrastructure brings jobs and tax revenue, promising to invest in renewable energy.

But here's what the press releases don't say: most proposed AI facilities would run proprietary models for a handful of tech giants, not serve Georgia residents or businesses. The state would bear the infrastructure burden while Silicon Valley captures the value.

The legislation faces an uphill battle. Tech companies have spent heavily on lobbying, and the promise of economic development is politically seductive. But Georgia's move signals growing resistance to treating electrical grids as infinite resources for AI's exponential growth.

Other states are watching. If Georgia succeeds, expect similar bills in Arizona, Texas, and anywhere else grid operators are quietly panicking about AI's appetite for power.