California just moved to exempt Linux and other open-source operating systems from its age-verification law after intense backlash from developers who pointed out the technical absurdity of requiring OS-level age checks. The amendment was proposed by the same lawmaker who wrote the original bill.Let that sink in. The person who wrote the law had to turn around and fix it because they didn't understand how operating systems work.This is what happens when legislators try to regulate technology they don't understand. The original law would have required operating systems to collect and verify users' ages before allowing access. For commercial OSes like Windows or macOS, that's at least theoretically possible (if deeply problematic). For Linux? It's nonsensical.Linux isn't a company. It's not a product you buy. It's open-source software maintained by thousands of volunteers across the world. There's no central authority that could implement age verification even if they wanted to. The entire point of Linux is that users have control over their own systems.The developer community reacted with a mixture of disbelief and dark humor. How exactly do you force an open-source operating system to check ages? Do you ask Linus Torvalds to add an age gate to the kernel? Do you require every Linux distribution to implement verification, knowing users can just compile their own version without it?To the lawmaker's credit, they recognized the problem and proposed an amendment. But the fact that this made it into a bill in the first place reveals a deeper issue with how tech policy gets made. Laws are being written by people who don't understand the technology they're regulating, and we only catch the absurd ones after they're already passed.This is the challenge of modern governance: technology moves faster than legislation, and the people making the laws often lack the technical literacy to understand what they're actually requiring. The Linux exemption is a win for common sense, but it's also a warning sign about how many other technically nonsensical laws might slip through.
|
